- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- JaC64 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
C64 emulator not covered in independent, reliable sources as far as I can tell. Pcap ping 09:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 09:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Can't find any coverage of this whatsoever. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) MrKIA11 (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, does not appear to be a notable emulator. JBsupreme (talk) 08:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.