- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- JaNEWary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no significant coverage for this 2012 News Years vote on Disney Channel. SL93 (talk) 03:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. When google asks you Did you mean: "JaNUary"?, there is a good chance that info doesn't exist. Crystallballing. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and/or merge to Disney Channel#2007 - Present - it exists see this. Rich Farmbrough, 19:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No significant coverage, no detail in article, no point in keeping it. --DThomsen8 (talk) 22:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.