- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 05:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 00:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The notability guidelines for future films stipulate that a stand-alone article for a film should not be created until a project enters production. This is because many factors such as budget issues, scripting issues, and casting issues can interfere with the project. The article can be recreated when principal photography is confirmed to have begun. Steve T • C 17:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "is said to be" those are the key words there.--The Dominator (talk) 05:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:NFF. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.