- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consesnsus was to keep. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 10:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Jaaz Multimedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Asserts notability but provides no references to support the claim - actually has no references at all. Company web-site is apparently a facebook page. Fail;s WP:CORP Velella Velella Talk 13:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable film production company in Bangladesh per sources. --Zayeem (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The references that have been added do confirm that this firm is actively promoting its proposition in the cinemas of the country, but are they sufficient to demonstrate notability? AllyD (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- According to the sources, this company is the first one to initiate digitization in Bangladeshi cinema, also one of the most reputed film production companies in Bangladesh. These points surely justify the inclusion of the article. Besides, the references given, also provide significant coverage about the subject.--Zayeem (talk) 20:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I wouldn't say the sources are reliable. Even if they are newspaper publications, the newspapers aren't themselves notable enough to prove to be reliable sources, which clearly justifies my vote.smtchahal(talk) 13:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Changing my vote to keep. Those sources should be enough, as far as WP:CORP is concerned. smtchahaltalk 11:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- And how the newspapers are not notable enough??.--Zayeem (talk) 18:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Kaler Kantho IS a notable newspapers. Kaler Kontho report says, they have signed a contract with Shree Venkatesh Films and making four films! Now the Venkatesh Films are the best production house of West Bengal at this moment. In addition, the article says— 2 films have released, 2 films post production works are going on etc! Also, I have searched in Google Bengali and found multiple mentions of this company, note the following search uses a variation of the Bengali script, see here. Reading these article, I am sure this is a notable film production house of Bangladesh, so, I am giving a "keep" vote! --Tito Dutta (contact) 18:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 03:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.