Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabal Ruwaydah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jabal Ruwaydah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Jabal Ruwaydah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V, GNG and Geoland. Pin points to wadi near village of Tawyeen. There are sources for an area called Ruwaydah on the Batinah coast of Oman. Also in Qatar! There's a single mention of a 500 metre high Jebel Ruwaydah at the head of the Wadi Sidkha (near Khatt), but that seems a little tenuous. It's certainly not at this ___location and not notable. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:40, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not verifiable. Reliability of reference is questionable, considering its poor track record in the other "Jabal" AfDs. — Newslinger talk 08:36, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per verifiability and track record of creator. Natureium (talk) 02:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - lacking notability and verifiability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:V. Sam Sailor 19:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.