Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackdaw with Crowbar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Only the nominator favors deletion; others were convinced by the breadth of coverage of the band. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:40, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jackdaw with Crowbar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A band. Plenty of assertion of notability but no evidence offered. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note - An established user is searching for references as we speak (type?). I'll reserve my !vote until he/she has finished their investigation. I think it will be beneficial to everyone if we give them at least a day before passing judgment. You're obviously free to do as you wish but with the number of claims made, I imagine finding a reference won't be too terribly difficult. OlYeller^Talktome 17:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Did the nominator look for any coverage? 2 Peel sessions, coverage in John Robb's book Death to Trad Rock and in John Corbett's book Extended play: sounding off from John Cage to Dr. Funkenstein,[1] members from 2 other notable bands.[2].--Michig (talk) 19:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Michig. Additionally, Melody Maker wrote a profile about this band; I added that citation just now. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was also an article on the band in Underground magazine, which I hope to be able to add as a source within a few days.--Michig (talk) 18:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Michig.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Possibly meets WP:BAND and coverage seems significant to meet WP:GNG. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 15:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.