- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 04:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jadu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotion for non-notable company; article by SPA. While there are many references cited, most of them are press releases, incidental mentions, simply links to customers, or narrow trade rags. I was unable to find substantial independent coverage. Haakon (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Non-promotion for notable company. Many examples of substantial independent coverage exist, e.g. from Google News.--Michig (talk) 08:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @137 · 02:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Non-promotion for notable company. Jadu contributes to a number of open source projects, most notable is Phalanger (compiler). Many references are reported from reputable sources (e.g. Computer Weekly, V3.co.uk, PublicTechnology).--Cosmotor (talk) 17:50, 6 December 2009 (UTC) — Cosmotor (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Keep. Non-promotion for notable company. I think the page is useful and should stay where it is - it demonstrates that the same web application can be run on both LAMP and IIS based servers, and also shows the relevancy of Phalanger as a cross-platform tool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedi58 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.