Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Cutts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:12, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about an un-noteworthy person, and is purely vanity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toryboy (talk • contribs)

Delete This article is not of any note whatsoever — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toryboy (talk • contribs)

• Delete, non-notable. 238 unique hits on Google, first result is Wikipedia article. Royboycrashfan 01:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable; vanity; fails WP:BIO --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Rob from NY 01:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unsuccessful political protestor.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, politicruft. They still have Thatcherites? --Deville (Talk) 02:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete minor activist with a fringe view. Even with the information in this article I stil lwouldn't know him from a hole in the ground. Just zis Guy you know? 11:00, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete probable vanity. ProhibitOnions 20:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all --Ugur Basak 21:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.