Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James and Q

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 15:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James and Q (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Original synthesis. Whatever is left after removal of the original research is already covered in the articles Epistle of James and Q document. Delete.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. WP:Original research. Pburka (talk) 20:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Clearly OR, reads like an essay. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 19:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.