Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Langius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Langius

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Jamie Langius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable political consultant. Mccapra (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I mean it has been tagged with a template questioning its notability for almost ten years. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 19:20, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Political consultants are not automatically notable just because they exist — he has held no roles that confer an automatic pass of WP:NPOL, and neither of the two references (one of which is self-published by a directly affiliated entity, and the other of which is a book about somebody else) establish that he would get over WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't really find good sources to support this. Delete per others. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 18:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - appointed roles do not pass WP:NPOL. Seems to be a run of the mill state-level consultant. Bearian (talk) 00:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not meet GNG.Cinadon36 17:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clearly fails notability. Ireneshih (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.