Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Balaskas (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep and cleanup, and renominate in suitable amount of time if article not expanded beyond current stub.. Avi 19:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Janet Balaskas (2nd nomination)
edit- Janet Balaskas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Author and active birth advocate. A prior AfD was overturned on review, with the directive that the sources should get more consideration. See the prior discussions for those sources. Proc nom, no op. ~ trialsanderrors 21:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep & Research I found quite a bit of info on her during the last AfD, but hoped someone else would save it. I can spend some time posting sources during this AfD. Based on past experience at AfD it should be a keeper. --Kevin Murray 01:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I posted the top ten Newsbank finds on Talk:Janet Balaskas. let me know if you need more info. ~ trialsanderrors 02:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless references added. References are a requirement for articles, not something it would be nice to have. If there aren't any, it can go until some come along. Stifle (talk) 23:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep People won't know to put them in if the article doesn't exist. Add a tag asking for references & cites & give it some time to improve. Trialsanderrors and Kevin Murray both have done some groundwork supporting her, so it's a matter of improving the article. I'll add a few cites. Balaskas is notable, if you know anything about women's health & childbirth movements. --lquilter 05:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Addhoc 19:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above searches. Addhoc 19:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.