- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 02:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Janey Robbins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 00:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Janey Robbins was part of Loose Ends, which satisfies the groundbreaking criteria of WP:PORNBIO in a negative sense. Her sex during bondage scene was one of the reasons the movie was prosecuted.[1][2] Because of the prosecution, companies stopped shooting heterosexual scenes with sex while the woman is still in bondage. I don't know if that is true today with the advent of internet porn (especially with companies like Kink around). Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:22, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Morbidthoughts's comment on her role in the lawsuit I feel meets the criteria of WP:PORNBIO. FlyingToaster 07:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. She may also have additional notability beyond the Loose Ends issue (would need to check), but I concur that her involvement in that situation satisfies the WP:PORNBIO requirements. 23skidoo (talk) 16:39, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A simple Google search very easily verifies her notability although the links I found were quite an eye opener! Paste (talk) 14:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.