Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jannik Olander (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Delete and Salt. Nakon 04:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jannik Olander

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable. The refs do not seem reliable. DGG ( talk ) 02:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agreed. Not notable. Rhode Island Red (talk) 04:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Acknowledging everything, I believe deleting outweighs everything else and my searches found nothing convincing with the best here (low coverage similiar to Nialaya Jewelry). SwisterTwister talk 07:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 10:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt - if this is to be recreated YET AGAIN, it should be done via Articles for Creation to make sure that any recreation is absolutely solid. Having voted Keep/Weak Keep originally, I do believe there's potential for an article here BUT it needs to be done properly. Mabalu (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.