Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JanusVR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The discussion is leaning toward a delete result. However, the respective "delete or merge" and (to a lesser extent) "keep for now" !votes and their rationales relative to Wikipedia guidelines essentially prevents this discussion from being closed as such. Due to limited participation after three relistings, closing with no prejudice against speedy renomination. Perhaps a merge would be a decent compromise. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JanusVR

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find any sources that cover the subject beyond mere mentions. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 15:16, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, for now. At first I thought I was inconclusive.. I googled "Janus Vr Browser" and a good amount of links came up specifically related to it. But I do agree there is little subject-covering and most is mentions the browser. If this is deleted I won't complain but it'd be good to at least try to expand it.--A Wild Abigail Appears! _{Capture me.} _Moves. 21:00, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Working on expanding this entry.--NXT Aussie (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge to Oculus Rift - Not seeing enough to pass WP:SOFTWARE/WP:GNG. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 07:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - The Herald (here I am) 15:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I closed this (NAC closure) as no consensus, but the nom wanted me to reopen this. Natg 19 (talk) 07:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.