- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 22:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Janus Thinking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article that purports to be about a new philosophy (which wouldn't merit an article here, per WP:NOR), but which is actually attempting to promote the company "Janus Thinking Ltd." and the website janusthinking.com, which apparently exist to propagate this new philosophy. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not sufficiently notable; not a new philosophy. Shanata (talk) 04:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - can't see the notability. Deb (talk) 18:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Good-faith search in the most relevant sources (books, scholar) fails to identify coverage giving rise to conclusion of notability. Bongomatic 04:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability concerns, borderline advertising/promotional problems. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.