Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Bailey (CEO)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:06, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Bailey (CEO)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:BIO. Reads like a cv. Some of the writing style is not in keeping with WP but that is a separate issue. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 18:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, doesn't appear notable per our guidelines, article is promotional. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, because he is working in radio (and has been a presenter) he seems to have the knack of 'putting himself out there' rather than a back room CEO, for example the news source already in the article and this one too. I'm willing to believe he may have some sort of public profile. Sionk (talk) 18:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given that editors have a predilection towards creating biographical articles would you change your !vote to weak delete?

-- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 18:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why. It's okay to create biographical articles as long as they meet a minimum standard of notability. My 'vote' is 'Weak' because two in-depth sources (so far identified) are the very minimum number to be 'multiple'. Sionk (talk) 18:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why is as I have stated. Also,we shoiuld look at the big picture. Should WP a Who's Who with a smattering of other articles, or should it be an encyclopaedia? -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete After reviewing this page and the page for Sun Broadcast Group, I am convinced they are using Wikipedia in violation of WP:PROMOTION. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --joeOnSunset (talk) 03:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Shorthate (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.