Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Fuller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Fuller

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Jason Fuller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. All but one of the sources are about the company he worked for; the remaining on is merely a list entry and does not, imo, go any way whatsoever to establishing notability. TheLongTone (talk) 12:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: "37th richest person" isn't quite notable. Sources are about the company he sold, so don't contribute to his notability, outside of any other sourcing... There is nothing that I find about this person. The company could perhaps be notable, this individual isn't. Oaktree b (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I do find some articles about him, but they are quite thin. There is the sale of his business Yorkshire news but the same content can be found in the cited articles so I assume it was a press release. The other "news" is that him fighting with neighbors about peasant shooting on his estate: Telegraph Yorkshire Post. I just don't see either his business affairs or his spats with neighbors to come up to GNG. Lamona (talk) 16:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.