The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 14:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Yoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable golfer, fails WP:NGOLF Tewapack (talk) 22:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. Tewapack (talk) 22:49, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 01:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per nom, clearly fails WP:NGOLF. Likely COI`/self-promotion as creator of article has made no other wiki contriburion. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 03:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep meets WP:GNG with continuing coverage in most national media. Has played at international level, is a current rep player for Canterbury. Article a bit dated and needs updating. NealeFamily (talk) 00:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - It fails WP:GNG: refs 1 and 4 are from his school so aren't "Independent of the subject", refs 3 and 5 are routine sports coverage and not "Significant coverage", that leaves ref 2. That is hardly the basis for an article. (BTW, he is not even ranked in the top 3000 in the amateur rankings [1]). Tewapack (talk) 16:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  07:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.