- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete, G12 copyvio from subject's website. (Non-admin closure) SwisterTwister talk 03:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jaylan tucker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable child actor and I haven't found any reliable evidence to establish notability or any evidence that proves he has achieved any acting roles yet. Despite that the article claims he has a recurring role for a FOX TV series, IMDb shows zero TV series appearances. As for the commercials, they would be insufficient to establish notability. Honestly, I believe it may be too soon for an article, perhaps a few years from now if he establishes himself as a well-known actor. SwisterTwister talk 19:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. His roles to date do not seem to satisfy WP:ENT, and I'm unable to locate significant coverage in reliable sources for this person to meet WP:GNG. Gongshow Talk 19:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't come close to meeting WP:NACTOR. If this remains, there's some sort of copyvio going on with the IMDB page, in at least a sentence or two, but I doubt it will matter. Ubelowme U Me 19:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe both the IMDb biography and this article were COI, the IMDb bio claims his mother wrote it and this article reads like a talent agency wrote it. SwisterTwister talk 19:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Far from meeting WP:ENT. SL93 (talk) 01:15, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not only does the kid not meet notability standards, but the page is pretty heavily lifted from his personal website word for word. Only thing it doesn't include is his agent's phone number. [1]Tokyogirl79 (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.