- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus cuz truth be told, we don't even know if this is the same guy or not. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jazzy B (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
There are a few passing mentions of a Jazzy B on Google News, but not this Jazzy B. It doesn't appear that this Jazzy B meets either WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC as I can find zero in the way of reliable third party coverage here. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 16:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the rationale I've provided as nominator. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 16:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep the article asserts notability (I think, with the hit album reference) but, it needs 3rd party reliable sources for verifiability. If the hit album doesn't assert notability please consider the keep above to be changed to a delete as I'm away from any sort of computer for the next several days. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Klausness (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Klausness (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The subject should not be confused with Jazzie B, the music producer and founder of Soul II Soul. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability is asserted but not in a proven way (not sourced or verifiable) ultimately after this is deleted it should be redirected to the "Jazzie B" webpage. JBsupreme (talk) 03:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Google news archives yield a fair number of hits, including articles from the New York Times and Times of India, both of which I've added as external links. There's more that could be added, but these seemed to be from the two most reliable sources, and significant coverage in two reliable sources is enough to keep the article. Klausness (talk) 20:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: IP address 67.82.28.83 just left the following note on the talk page: "Dont delete this page. He is a legitimate artist with some big hits. However, the article needs to be expanted". Klausness (talk) 11:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, secondary coverage by the NYT and Times of India means that this person meets WP:BIO. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.