Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Delyth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jen Delyth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At points I thought this showed signs of notability, but what looked like a review was on closer inspection a sales pitch from a shop selling her book etc. Very promotional, and under that she doesn't seem to meet notability. Boleyn (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete concur with rational: reads like a promo, and shows little if any notability. TomStar81 (Talk) 14:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't see what would be left if we removed all the undesirable elemnts of the article, (self-)promotion, links to commercial sites, unreliable, related sources. There is no significant coverage by independent, reliable sources. What I miss most in this artist bio is a critical assessment of the work. Mduvekot (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.