- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 02:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jen Statsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A writer for Late Night with Jimmy Fallon. According to IMDb, she has only been working since 2011. Only one reliable ref to be found and that is the New York Times article. This is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Bgwhite (talk) 23:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 23:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: She does have 26,511 twitter followers. She was also featured in the NYU Alumni Magazine[1] because she's probably the most famous person tweeter ever to graduate from there. I can't think of anything funny to write in this comment to get Jen Statsky to tweet about this deletion discussion.--Milowent • hasspoken 03:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Milowent and Statsky were all twitterpated and went into a bar.... Bgwhite (talk) 06:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Number of twitter followers is irrelevant. Anyone can generate that number or more... if they don't mind a posse of spambots trailing them. DarkAudit (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have like 300, I take every fake hot chick that follow me, though they usually get banned quickly. I can't pay for them like Newt Gingrich. Um, twitter followers, not hot chicks. Which I don't pay for either. Ugh. Maybe we could merge this article into List of Twitter users, which even my inclusionist self finds the existence of rather incredible, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Twitter users.--Milowent • hasspoken 05:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ARTIST. Jen Statsky doesn't meet any of these criteria. WP:GNG requires wide significant coverage, more than just one lifestyle piece in a very prominent newspaper. --Joshuaism (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.