Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Applegate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Applegate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Natg 19 (talk) 00:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep:~~Delete ~~It has many examples of the actor's filmography which are of significant notability~~ Lack of sources. Music1201 (talk) 04:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. I can find a single useful reliable source about this guy. His suicide would suggest he may've garnered some sort of significant attention, but all of my searches proved this guy is non-notable. In addition, he needs to have multiple SIGNIFICANT, MAJOR roles, not just several minor parts. editorEهեইдအ😎 04:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see any coverage in reliable sources. There were a few blog and forum posts that pointed out he and his character in Heathers both died by suicide, but you can't make an article out of IMDb trivia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is another biography questionable for WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Total lack of anything approaching a reliable secondary source. The article says his biggest role was as Peter Dawson, without giving any source for this view. If it is true, it probably shows he is just not notable. That was a role that gets him listed 11 in a listing of the cast. So it was a marginally notable role in a not particularly well known film. Nothing here comes close to establishing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.