Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Prentice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:28, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Prentice

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insignificant secondary coverage, all selfpublished, neologism, dubious notability Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added references. Coverage of her in major publications including Globe and Mail, SF Gate and other San Francisco area press; "locavore" was Oxford Dictionaries' word of the year, with press coverage, and wide usage including New York Times article; criticism of her work published in Esquire and National Geographic. Colapeninsula (talk) 15:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the legwork-based on that, I withdraw the nom.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:09, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.