Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jester'z Improv Comedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:07, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jester'z Improv Comedy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable performing group. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources and notable mentions in Google News. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:42, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I found two mentions of the troupe in their local news, ([1], [2]), with the second looking to be more about a specific person than the actual troupe. There is a review of sorts at About.com, but I'm not sure that these three things are really enough to show a depth of coverage. Even if we count the one that's more about a sixteen year old girl than the troupe, that's only three sources and we really need more than that. I have no problem with someone userfying it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete insufficient wide coverage, not to mention the article looks like an advert. LibStar (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For the same reasons identified above. Kabirat (talk) 09:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.