Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JetBird

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JetBird

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears to describe a business that never happened. It reads like an advertisement and, as it stands, the article barely asserts notability (CSD A7). RA (talk) 21:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of notability or the fact the company operated. MilborneOne (talk) 09:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree with nominator. Advertisement and doesn't assert notability. Vacation9 (talk) 00:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't distinguish itself from the endless other failed business ventures.Citing (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.