Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jgk computer solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising for a non-notable small business in Australia; just 41 Google hits and an Alexa ranking of more than 5,600,000. Created by Jgk-cs (talk · contribs), who removed a prod notice added by me and seconded by NMChico24 (talk · contribs). szyslak (t, c, e) 06:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Per nom and the fact that it reads like it was written by someone within the company. tmopkisn ^tlka 06:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. An advert. Fails WP:CORP, violates WP:SPAM and no assertion of importance.--Fuhghettaboutit 07:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, definitely spam. The user's only edits are to that article, the article has a very personal tone, etc etc. --ColourBurst 07:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, spam spam spam spam... --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 07:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:CORP. --Shizane 08:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "JGK Computer Solutions looks like it has a strong future and may go somewhere"... Please inform us when you do finally "go somewhere." --NMChico24 08:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Canley 12:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as NMChico24, Shizane, ColourBurst and Coredesat talk. o.o;; DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT _{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 15:27, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete very small web design startup (per portfolio). No other real external reviews or articles, written like ad. Kuru ^talk 15:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There have been no references to this company in an Australian media reference centre and it doesn't Google particularly well. Capitalistroadster 04:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Roisterer 05:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Longhair 22:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn.Blnguyen | rant-line 01:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn company, advertising. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 09:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn -- Chuq 23:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete seems like an ad. not even dressed up to seem encyclopaedic. Xtra 04:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. NN company / vanity. Cnwb 05:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.