Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiminy Lummox/Bass Masters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. I am firmly discounting Hipocrite's comment again, and am pleased to see a similar one by another editor withdrawn. There are decent, if minimal, arguments made for retaining the content so there's no consensus to delete. Someone does need to fix the article and its title, though. -Splash^talk 04:19, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NN, D ComCat 02:10, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is a poorly written article about an episode of a television series. --Metropolitan90 07:07, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Metropolitan90 — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 07:07, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep malformed afd Dlyons493 Talk 08:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • So fix it. Please vote based on the article. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:37, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Split episodes and keep. Ren & Stimpy episodes are notable even if they are in a crummy format. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:37, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The content isn't worth preserving in these particular cases. Secondly, it's a double episode in a single article, so arguments about the show are somewhat beside the point. This article is unusable to researchers and is at an unsearchable title. Geogre 10:48, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hence my comment to split the article (see Category:Pages to be split). Cherish your move button! - Mgm|^(talk) 11:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Malformed AFD. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please vote on the article, not the nominator or do not vote. Protesting someone's "abuse of AFD" by abusing AFD is, in fact, similar grounds for RfC. Let's not do that, folks. Geogre 15:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Geogre. Dottore So 15:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please we have simpsons and south park episodes too Yuckfoo 23:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Geogre. Also registering my agreement with Geogre and Mgm in re: the fact that people should vote on AfD based on the contents of the article alone, and whether that article meets the criteria for deletion. Voting on the merits of the nominator is bogus, and pretty much a textbook example of argumentum ad hominem. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 12:16, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per Yuckfoo. Kappa 12:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.