- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No support for the nomination. Owen× ☎ 21:05, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jobedu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable business and most of the sources and refs cited don't even talk about the business itself or even mention it Alikhamahu (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:50, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jordan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:50, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:50, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - nom reason of
most of the sources... don't even talk about...or even mention it
is unfounded. See [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] and more... no commentary on how many are actually RS, but more than one of these would generally be considered a RS enough to establish independent, third-party notability. TiggerJay (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV per sources above / in the article.4meter4 (talk) 23:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.