- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. obvious consensus--lack of evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 23:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Jobstream Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company with no secondary sources, edited by coi editor and his sockpuppet TeapotgeorgeTalk 10:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No attempt made to demonstrate notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:CORPPaste Let’s have a chat. 18:32, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per foregoing. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 18:16, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.