- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 23:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nom - non-notable "star" of non-notable video (a video previously AfD'd). Other than the non-notable video, this person has no other claim to notability. If the video fails notability, and its "star" has only this to his/her credits, then it follows that the star is also not notable. Rklawton 02:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - flawless reasoning. --Dmz5 03:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Borderline speedy. MER-C 06:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Which establishes any attempt at notability, that he's a drag queen? That he had polio? That a video of this drag queen is making the rounds on the Internet? To me, the answer seems to be "none of the above." Speedy delete CSD A7 B.Wind 06:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Moving to Speedy... SkierRMH,10:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP. the piece can be catagorised as "internet phenomenon". it is a disturbing piece of work - known as "the goddess bunny" - since wikipedia is the online information source, i would want to have the background information regarding the piece. Candymoan 11:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This AfD is about the person, not the video. The video has already been AfD'd. See also WP:NOT. Rklawton 20:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.