- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Johnny Gamble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable software developer/blogger. There is a lack of reliable sources to support the assertions made in the article. Mattinbgn\talk 20:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This is a disputed PROD. Some reasoning is supllied on the talk page. -- Mattinbgn\talk 20:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 20:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Probably could have been speedied as a non-notable website founder. As it stands, article is unsourced, fansite material. TN‑X-Man 21:50, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Notability requirements are not met, also concur with Tnxman's view.--VS talk 22:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree... sources were added. As this is a blogger no academic sources have been quoted; instead other independent sites have been quoted, all of which give the blogger and his efforts decent reviews. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pondelion (talk • contribs) 01:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources were the subject's own website mentioned in the article. None of the sources added are either independent of the subject or have any sort of fact checking, both of which are required per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Try again. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 01:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The sources in this article are either secondary or from the subject's own website. He lacks WP:N as of June 2008--no independent major references. Artene50 (talk) 10:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, would not appear to meet the notability criteria for biographies at this time; no secondary sources to vouch for the notability of this person. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete No reliables. Five Years 13:57, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.