- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Johnny Robo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This doesn't seem to establish any real notability. It just appears to be some sort of amateur production (as detailed by the "company" name) that won't receive any major coverage in reliable sources. TTN (talk) 22:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no real claim of improtance/significance which is supported by significant coverage in reliable 3rd party sources means it fails both WP:N and WP:V. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems to be a fan project. I see no evidence that the concept has been commercially released or sold anywhere, let alone published about. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination and Sjakkalle. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WOW!!! The video is all over the net... in clips and blogs. Bring it back when it has a reliable non-blog review. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.