Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Yuma (C.O.P.S.)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone wants to merge some of the material I'll be happy to provide a copy. Olaf Davis (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Yuma (C.O.P.S.)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article on minor television character. Jrh7925 (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it should be deleted or merged with the man article Dwanyewest (talk) 20:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can find no independent sources substantively discussing this character, who apparently appears in only one episode of the series, so I'm saying that the topic fails to satisfy the requirements of the GNG. The article seems nothing more than a platform for a plot summary of the episode. A smerge to C.O.P.S. is possible, I guess; but what's the point of merging more unsourced content to an article that itself lacks any cited sources? This looks even more unnecessary when it's considered that we don't have an article about the real Johnny Yuma (and I'm not suggesting that one is needed). Deor (talk) 05:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable one-shot character. Nate • (chatter) 08:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the other commentators it should be deleted but we should also delete the other COPS character pages I nominated they are no better than this article.

Dwanyewest (talk) 08:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.