Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:41, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Joint Learning Network for Universal Health Coverage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A google search throws up a flood of sources, but it would appear that they are all published by the parent organisation, or are similarly closely connected with the subject. I can't find any suitable sources. The author is an employee of the parent organisation, and I think it may just be WP:TOOSOON for this article. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 20:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable at this time. Everything found at Google is self-referential. Google News Archive finds only five hits, all passing mentions. A few mentions are found at Google Scholar, and this may be the route by which this project eventually gains notability - if it ever does. --MelanieN (talk) 15:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent evidence of notability. Famousdog (c) 13:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 01:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.