Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolt (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:01, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jolt (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character sourced only to primary sources and thus fails WP:GNG. A merge to a minor characters list is usually appropriate here but none appears to exist. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Black Kite (t) (c) 23:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Major character in a recent notable film. Mathewignash (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not convinced by any of the sources in that article. J Milburn (talk) 09:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Can't turn into a redirect since this is multiple unrelated characters. Also, the Revenge of the Fallen Jolt is so not a "Major character in a recent notble film". NotARealWord (talk) 13:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Why is this mediocre nonsense tolerated it has no reliable sources it can't really assert notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know why. Articles for unworthy Transformers characters seem to have been up for quite a long time. NotARealWord (talk) 19:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no third-party sources exist which are needed in order to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Split the article based along the different series, merge into their respective series character lists, and convert to a disambiguation page. —Farix (t | c) 22:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.