- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jon Barron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable psuedoscience personality. Article is vague, unreferenced, unverified, with no hope of getting there. The page is veiled advertising, and uses buzzwords like "de-mystify", "nutraceutical researcher", and "formulary consultant". MrPrada (talk) 05:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT <eleland/talkedits> 08:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. subject has published works, but i'm not finding any secondary sources talking about him except for customer testimonials. therefore, does not meet WP:BIO - Owlmonkey (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.