Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joomsef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joomsef

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly unlikely to be any more notable now (given that searching finds only download sites, and no actual sources) than it was 7 years ago when the only existing source (which is the company that develops it) was added. Revent^talk 09:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NSOFT. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It doesn't meet wikipedia notability standards. Only one source? That too it's own website? Please delete it. - Supdiop (T🔹C) 09:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for references since 2008. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 15:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.