- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Josh Albee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ENT rather significantly; the most appearances he's ever had in a single program is 3, and he doesn't have the credits to fulfil it with a string of minor roles. Ironholds (talk) 15:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Not a celebrity actor, but clearly passes WP:ENT with major film role, multiple TV appearances, and lead roles in live action (Tom Sawyer) and animated productions (Oliver Twist). GNews search shows specific discussion of Tom Sawyer performance. Not terribly durable as acting careers go, but once notable, always notable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Simply multiple TV appearances is not enough; it requires "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." - one major film role is not enough. If the live action is notable, I'm not seeing it. Ironholds (talk) 15:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sourcing, and most of the article was namedropping and coatrack, since removed. If he passes WP:ENT... WP:PROVEIT. Jclemens (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Not that I'm fully convinced, as I have only begun a search, I did find that as a child actor he was covered in the August 1973 issue of SPEC. For one of his projects, the March 1973 Los Angeles Times called him a called him a "a low-key Tom Sawyer" [1]. He seemes to get about the coverage one might expect for a child star of the 70s[2]. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.