Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Spanogle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Spanogle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entire article (two lines) is a copy violation. Rathfelder (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copyright violation, the alleged source is using text from the Wikipedia article ("This author page uses material from the Wikipedia article "Joshua Spanogle", which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0"). Hut 8.5 21:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we lack the level of citation needed to establish notability, especially on an article on a living person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - He seems to have written three medical thrillers which are described here as bestsellers in the United States and sell on Amazon and elsewhere. I believe he meets WP:AUTHOR. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the nominator's stated concern can be fixed but Notability is clear on WP:AUTHOR having both coverage and WorldCat. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.