Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journalism of depth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Journalism of depth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Two prods have been added and removed. The reasons were that the article is an essay inappropriate for Wikipedia and that it is unverifiable. The article also lacks any sources. Mallanox 23:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This should help. Uncle G 00:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (and merge). The article is a long essay about Wadah Khanfar and Al Jazeera. There's some salvagable material, but it needs to be in those two articles - in fact, to a great extent, it already is. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 09:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Update: The article's been edited down to something much smaller now, but it's still an essay about Wadah Khanfar and Al Jazeera, and the material belongs there. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 12:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete unless written in a more comprehensive way, and sourced properlyDGG 22:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. - G1ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 05:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.