Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journalistic writing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 17:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Journalistic writing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Merge or delete: Very stubby duplicate of News style (to which News writing and Journalistic style already redirect). May have hard/soft lede material in it worth merging into News style, otherwise just delete it and redirect it to News style. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 11:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect per nom--Victor falk 13:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect. The bit about Charnley is well worth moving over to news style. But we definitely don't need both. --Dhartung | Talk 13:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect per above. "Journalistic writing" is a reasonably likely search term, and the article on news style seems the most pertinent. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect per nom. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 15:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.