- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No Consensus to delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Judith Hooper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable beyond being the author of one book. Northwestgnome (talk) 17:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith talk 18:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One book - notable only for attracting refutation - does not equal notability. See the recent afd for David Percy. Brianyoumans (talk) 17:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep She's co-written a couple other books which received reviews (The Three-Pound Universe [1] and Would the Buddha Wear a Walkman [2]) and has a profile in Gale's Contemporary Authors. Zagalejo^^^ 20:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Zagalejo shows that other books by her have been reviewed and that it is not just Of moths and men. Additionally the comparison to David Percy is not appropriate; there was apparently no significant coverage of his theories, when this is clearly not the the case for Judith Hooper. Suicidalhamster (talk) 23:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.