Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JudoJoe Productions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. -- Steel 13:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Man I wish I'd just speedied this one. I put up a prod that read
- Page obviously created with a bad conflict of interest. No reliable third-party coverage whatsoever. Fails WP:CORP, WP:WEB.
It was removed by an anon with the edit summary "give them time to cough up sources". I believe that will be hard since JudoJoe (talk · contribs) edits every 6 months and since... there are no sources. 51 unique Ghits, mostly bulletin boards...Pascal.Tesson 03:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V. --Sable232 04:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Kill Kill Kill per common sense -Toptomcat 04:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. —EdGl 04:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - corporate vanity. So tagged. MER-C 04:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - Forget about corporate vanity. It seems to simply BE vanity. -WarthogDemon 05:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Fails everything test SkierRMH,07:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.