- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE - There is not much credible information to determine notability, and the few people who have looked, have inclined or agreed with deletion; however, there is some claim to notability, so will WP:USERFY on request, or someone may make a request at WP:REFUND SilkTork ✔Tea time 01:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Juffage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dubious notability for this musician. Has a couple of self published releases, plus a release through Function Records, which itself has been previously deleted from Wikipedia as a non notable record label. Has some minor mention in minor publications. Article is an autobiography. Appears to fail WP:Notability (music). Safiel (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment At last, an easy name to Google. I found one NME album review[1] and Artrocker had him do a playlist but with no info on him[2]; nothing else in major publications (Pitchfork, DiS, Guardian, Independent, Rolling Stone, Q, Telegraph). Nothing in local media (Yorkshire Post) either. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of coverage found by Colapeninsula. JohnCD (talk) 20:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.