Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JumpStart (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 03:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- JumpStart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's almost 100% unsourced, and the notability is certainly not reflective of the article length. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I found these sources:
- 3 reviews for JumpStart Pet Rescue[1]
- 7 reviews for JumpStart Escape From Adventure Island [2]
- CNet Editor's review of JumpStart World 2nd Grade [3]
- TopTenReviews JumpStart 2011 review [4] (I haven't heard of this site, but it's in the videogames RS search)
- JumpStart Toddlers and JumpStart Babies synopsis at allgame [5] [6]
- JumpStart Music and JumpStart Typing reviews at allgame [7] [8]
- The "Jump Ahead" branding fairs less well: They are listed at allgame and metacritic but do not appear to have been reviewed anywhere. Nevertheless, I think there's enough here for a series overview article. Marasmusine (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Without digging too much, search gets reliable source hits. Certainly past the point of WP:GNG. Not that the article couldn't do with a little cleanup, but that's not the AfD's job. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 17:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep The article needs a lot of work, but the jumpstart series is has been and is still used an a large number of schools in the US (or at least in VA), and has been around since I was a kid in the early 90's. Definitely noteworthy. --Djohns21 (talk) 00:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It might be that it would make a better list of software than an article but I see collective notability based on the above sources. Someoneanother 17:38, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources found above establish notability. If the article is 100% unreferenced, how about fixing it?. You've got about 10+ to work with now. Agent VodelloOK, Let's Party, Darling! 21:52, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.