- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Jung Lin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The most notable thing about this pianist mentioned in the article was being part of a major Chopin recital. Okay — but where's the notability? Delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Passes WP:NM. A brief look on google also shows that subject passes WP:GNG Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 02:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- notability not demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 03:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Might be WP:BIAS. Subject is a Taiwanese so reliable secondary sources in English may be hard to be found. Suggest help be requested at WP:WikiProject Countering systemic bias. Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 06:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- As noted in the article itself, her active area is supposed to be New York City, not Taiwan. I don't see a systemic bias issue here. --Nlu (talk) 10:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Might be WP:BIAS. Subject is a Taiwanese so reliable secondary sources in English may be hard to be found. Suggest help be requested at WP:WikiProject Countering systemic bias. Arteyu ? Blame it on me ! 06:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Not notable enough IMO. If someone can provide more secondary sources, I would change my mind. ScienceApe (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.