- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 07:40Z
Not notable band, was deleted by Prod but resurrected Alex Bakharev 23:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonnotable. If the recreation is similar to what was deleted, CSD G4 may apply. YechielMan 01:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment CSD G4 doesn't apply to Prods. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 16:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 10:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MUSIC says it isn't notable enough.--Dacium 01:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete I'm from the Philippines, and I've never heard of this band (not even in print or in indie radio). --- Tito Pao 15:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per TitoPao and nom. When the band is signed with a major label and has released a video or music's heard in radio, only then. But now, delete. Berserkerz Crit 20:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Also, google test returned only 4 hits. 2 from Wikipedia, 1 from an irrelevant site and 1 from friendster.Lenticel 05:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.