Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junk silver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Silver as an investment. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) Слава Україні! 06:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Junk silver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I boldly added content from this page to Silver as an investment (a small merge, you may say), and when I'm done, most content are either included there, or were not encyclopedic enough to remain (e.g. listcruft or excessively subjective original research).

Disclosure: I wrote a PAM for this page. NotReallySoroka (talk) 06:43, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.