Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JurisTech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:30, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JurisTech

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

JurisTech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NCORP/WP:ORGCRIT and the broader WP:GNG. All listed citations are either routine local business pieces such as The Star, The Edge Malaysia and The Malaysian Reserve, re‑posted press‑release material on company or partner blogs, or passing mentions (e.g. a single paragraph in The Founder's Mentality). None provides the sustained, in‑depth, independent secondary coverage required by policy. The one heavily repeated story – CTOS Digital’s 2022 purchase of a 49 % stake – is a standard business transaction and therefore WP:ROUTINE; routine corporate deals do not in themselves confer notability. AndesExplorer (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Technology, and Malaysia. AndesExplorer (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• weak delete they didnt actually win the award that is claimed (a personal award was given to their CEO), they got second/third price. I could not find significant coverage in the other sources. --hroest 15:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.